Catt on “Energy Current” and Heaviside’s “We reverse this .... ”

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/778b.htm Whereas usually the electric current is said to cause the fields within a (two wire) transmission line, Oliver Heaviside says "We reverse this"; the field (flux) travels down between the wires and causes an electric current in the wires.

Associate Editor Giuseppe Pelosi, who edited the defamatory article http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf refers to this website, where we find; http://www.ivorcatt.org/digihwdesignp65.htm ; http://www.ivorcatt.org/digihwdesignp66.htm ; This went on the www in 2007, 5 years before the ignorant falsifiers Massimiliano Pieraccini and Stefano Selleri said Catt thought the opposite;

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf “The ‘Anomaly’ is there because in his [Catt’s] view, currents are the source of the TEM wave, and should be there before the wave they cause.” So the only time in 30 or 50 years when anything relating to Catt got past peer review, it was to defame him and falsify the central theme of Catt’s 60 years of work.

Now the Editor Mahta Moghaddam tells me to submit any future articles to the failed peer review steeplechase, and does not even answer when I ask her to drop the rest, and just publish 50 words by me, not mentioning the Italians, on electromagnetic theory, edited only by her.

Ivoor Catt 1 February 2017

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf “However, in our opinion, Catt probably misinterprets the concepts of charge and field. The “Anomaly” is there because in his view, currents are the source of the TEM wave, and should be there before the wave they cause.“

This, the only peer reviewed publication on Catt's work for 30 or 50 years misrepresents Catt on this key issue, which is central to Heaviside's and Catt's work.. This is very damaging for science. We can call it irresponsible or ignorant. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x31n.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6aa.pdf

Here is Catt;

http://www.ivorcatt.org/digihwdesignp65.htm 1979

http://www.ivorcatt.com/6_4.htm

“Heaviside wrote (Ref.22);

"Now in Maxwell's theory there is the potential energy of the displacement produced in the dielectric parts by the electric force, and there is the kinetic or magnetic energy of the magnetic induction due to the magnetic force in all parts of the field, including the conducting parts. They are supposed to be set up by the current in the wire. We reverse this; the current in the wire is set up by the energy transmitted through the medium around it...."

The importance of Heaviside's phrase, "We reverse this;" cannot be overstated for digital designers. It points to the watershed between the 'practical electricians', who have held sway for the last half century, promulgating their theory - which we shall call "Theory N", the Normal Theory: that the cause is electric currents in wires and electromagnetic fields are merely an effect - and the 'ethereals', who believe what we shall call "Theory H": that the travelling field is the cause, and electric currents are merely an effect of these fields.”

– Ivor Catt 2 February 2017

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x59b1.htm

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.htm

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x311.htm