April 2016
|
4:54 PM (6 minutes ago)
|
|
||
Dear Klaus Witzel,
"What can
I do for you? My speciality is the levels (layers) of language behind which
academic scientists obscure their teachings and their alleged insights." -
KW
I think this
is close to part of the help I need.
Since it is
not permissible to suggest there is a fatal flaw in classical electromagnetism,
I merely asked for clarification of classical electromagnetism.
For the purpose of this email, some definitions.
Careerists v real scientists.
Means Defenders of the Faith v Heretics.
I think your
speciality will stretch to the case of "The Catt Question". We see
"levels (layers) of language" used to obscure and avoid a very simple
Question asking for clarification of classical electromagnetism.
Example. Since expert careerists
contradicted each other, it was falsely alleged that they were asked different
questions.
It was said
that the Question was "wrong".
It was said
that the Question was not a Question, but rather an assertion that classical
theory was faulty.
The Questioner
did not understand mathematics, even though the Question contained no
mathematics.
The Questioner
was rude.
The careerist
(knighted for services to physics) had changed his mind, and now agreed with
the other (Nobel prize winning) careerist - but the
first careerist himself did not say so.
The Questioner
was racist.
The Questioner
was "outside academia and structured science".
All careerist
answers were all agreed.
This has gone
on for 35 years.
""What
can I do for you?"
Look into this
case. However, it will take you a long time. However, this case is rich with
interest.
If you are
willing to pursue it, I will send you the other key www addresses. Two are
here;
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/
II think my
strategy is unique. I appreciate that in today's professional (careerist)
science, it is unacceptable to propose a new paradigm. That would cause too
much damage to careerists. Instead, and uniquely, I have asked for
clarification of the careerists' classical theory, which careerists are unable
to answer.
Careerists are
also unable to explain "The Wakefield Experiment", and none of them
will comment on the results of that experiment.
Ivor Catt
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/