Between 2011 and 2012, Massimo/
Massimiliano Pieraccini
came up with the answer to “The Catt Question”. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm
“Catt’s Anomaly”
“L’anomalia (di Catt)” by Massimiliano Pieraccini, pub. Rizzoli 2011. In Italian.
A
novel. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5a31.htm
.... ....
M «Are you kidding?» “Nobody with an ounce of common sense would risk their career and scientific reputation to study the Catt anomaly” Massimo thought, “and even if they were spending time on this, they wouldn’t be telling people about it”.
M «It’s an unresolved paradox of classical electromagnetism» Massimo cut it short.
A «Obviously you won’t find the Catt anomaly in university textbooks» Alexander pointed out sarcastically. He felt like talking about it, and Fabio was getting curious.
F «But what’s your opinion?»
M «Science is not such a monolith as it looks
in manuals» Massimo said, not answering the question directly. «It has rather a
patchy structure: here and there, very well explained details give the
impression of an extraordinary explanatory power, but all around them are huge
gray areas that no one is willing to investigate, because everyone thinks there
is nothing much there»
F «So isn’t the Catt anomaly interesting enough?»
[to give it five pages in a novel? Not mentioned in any peer reviewed journal for 30 years.]
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
242
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 54, No. 6, December 2012
Catt’s
Anomaly
Massimiliano
Pieraccini and Stefano Selleri
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf
“most of the answers agreed
in considering the problem not to be an anomaly at all. They explained the
phenomenon by resorting to the very high number of electrons in the metal,
which can follow the TEM wave at a speed of c,
generating an appropriate current, even if each single electron moved at
a drift velocity much smaller than c. Indeed, what the theory requires is an
appropriate current. However, current is the product of charge density and
speed: where there is a high charge density, the speed could also be very slow.
Physic ally, a current follows the field traveling at
the speed c, but this current is due to a great number of slowly moving
electrons”
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
As to the article in “Physics Education”, below, the
Editor Gary Williams first rejected my reply, and then refused even to publish
30 words giving a hyperlink to the web page with my reply. This is in spite of
the fact that his journal has a “letters” section. This is of course totally
unconscionable behaviour. Ivor Catt, 13 April 2016.
718 PHYSICS EDUCATION 48(6)
0031-9120/13/060718+05$33.00 c 2013 IOP Publishing Lt
An
apparent paradox: Catt’s anomaly
M
Pieraccini and S Selleri
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5as2.pdf
“it has a clear and satisfactory solution and it can be
considered indubitably just an apparent paradox.”
“The solution.
The key idea of the explanation of this apparent paradox is related to the
great number of electrons in metal. Although each single electron is not able
to travel at the speed of light, a great number of slow electrons are able to
produce a current as fast as an electromagnetic wave travelling at the speed of
light in the conductor.”
“Conclusion. Catt’s anomaly is just an exercise that can be solved with the conceptual tools of basic electromagnetism”
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
November 2013 PHYSICS EDUCATION 719
718 PHYSICS
EDUCATION 48(6) 0031-9120/13/060718+05$33.00 c
2013 IOP Publishing Ltd
An apparent paradox: Catt’s anomaly
M Pieraccini and S Selleri
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5as2.pdf
pp720, 721
This incoming current lasts for a time
interval ∆t and produces in the wire length ∆x an imbalance of charge ∆Q given by ∆Q=I∆ t=I∆ x⁄ c .
(2)
“and produces in the wire length ∆x an imbalance of charge ∆Q”. This large amount of charge is not uniformly
distributed in the section ∆x.
It is all concentrated at the left hand end of that section, because it
travelled slowly.
After ∆t has elapsed, the current starts to flow out of our sampling volume and the charges
entering from the left are balanced by those escaping towards the right.
“After ∆t has elapsed, the current starts to flow out of our sampling volume” Not so,
because the charge required to produce this current
flowing out is far away at the left hand of ∆x. Before it could start to
flow out of the section ∆x , some of it would have to
traversed the length ∆x
at the speed of light.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
What follows is the letter (answer) submitted to
“Physics Education” on 14 December 2015.
I could not get through the submission protocol because
I could not give and institution I belonged to, since I do not belong to an
institution. I submitted it direct to
the editor.
Origin of "The Catt
Question" http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm
Traditionally. when a TEM step (i.e. logic
transition from low to high) ( Figures 3, 4, 5 from Electromagnetism 1
) travels through a vacuum from left to right, guided by two conductors (the
signal line and the 0v line), there are four factors which make up the wave;
- electric current
in the conductors i
- magnetic field, or flux, surrounding the conductors B
- electric charge on the surface of the conductors +q
, -q
- electric field, or flux, in the vacuum terminating on the charge (Figure 2), D
The key to grasping the question is to concentrate on
the electric charge -q on the bottom conductor.
The step advances one foot per nanosecond. Extra negative charge appears on the
surface of the bottom conductor to terminate the new lines (tubes) of electric
flux D (figure 2) which
appear between the top (signal) conductor and the bottom conductor.
Since 1982 the question has been: Where does this new
charge come from?
Sir Michael Pepper, Knighted "for services to Physics", privately
writes that it comes from the south.
Nobel Prizewinner Professor Josephson privately writes
that it comes from the west.
After being ignored by all peer reviewed journals for
a third of a century, Massimiliano Pieraccini and Stefano Selleri
published two replies, one being in this journal. They took a small section of
the transmission line ∆x and discussed the
charge entering and leaving it, concluding that there was no real paradox.
November 2013 PHYSICS EDUCATION 719
718 PHYSICS EDUCATION 48(6)
0031-9120/13/060718+05$33.00 c
2013 IOP
Publishing Ltd
An apparent paradox: Catt’s anomaly
M Pieraccini and S Selleri
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5as2.pdf
pp719, 721
“The solution. The key idea of the explanation of this apparent paradox is related to
the great number of electrons in metal. Although each single electron is not
able to travel at the speed of light, a great number of slow electrons are able
to produce a current as fast as an electromagnetic wave travelling at the speed
of light in the conductor.”
In the race
between the electrons and the TEM wave, or between the tortoise(s) and the
hare, however we look at it, 100 or even 1,000 tortoises will fall further and
further behind.
“This incoming current lasts for a time
interval ∆t and produces in the wire length ∆x an imbalance of
charge ∆Q given by ∆Q=I∆ t=I∆ x⁄ c . (2)”
“and produces in the
wire length ∆x an imbalance of charge ∆Q”. This very
large amount of charge is not uniformly distributed in the section ∆x. It
is all concentrated at the left hand end of that section, ∆∆x,
because it travelled slowly.
“After ∆t has elapsed, the current
starts to flow out of our sampling volume and
the charges entering from the left are balanced by those escaping towards the
right.”
“After ∆t has elapsed, the current starts to flow out of our sampling volume” Not so,
because the charge required to produce this current
flowing out is far away at the left hand end of ∆x. Before it could start
to flow out of the section ∆x, some of it would have to have traversed
the length ∆x at the speed of light.
Ivor Catt 14 December 2015.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
|
||||
To
the Editor, Physics Education.
An
apparent paradox: Catt’s anomaly
E-mail: massimiliano.pieraccini@unifi.
718
PHYSICS EDUCATION 48(6) 0031-9120/13/060718+05$33.00 c
November
2013 PHYSICS EDUCATION 719
1.
The article is about me. Is there a right of reply, and what is the procedure?
2.
Did you know about the IEEE article? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x311.htm
|
||||