Emails
were sent out in March 2013
No
journalist will touch this material, although it is obviously interesting and
would increase sales. By 14 February 2014, nobody had replied, as I predicted.
Although
I correctly predicted this, I have difficulty developing a full understanding
as to why. 1 February 2014
Why
did I correctly predict that Highfield would not
reply? Ivor Catt, 14 February 2014.
On 29 January 2014 I emailed Roger Highfield
about all this. Will he reply? No.
Ivor
Catt,
121 Westfields,
St. Albans AL3 4JR
01727 864257
25 March 2013
Jonathan
Leake,
Science
Editor,
Sunday
Times,
3
Thomas More Square,
London
E98 1ST
Dear
Jonathan Leake,
I
enclose my April 2013 article, which is at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf
You
will find that no one with reputation wholly or partly based on electromagnetic
theory will comment on it in writing. See what you find.
All
responses, including yours, will be assembled at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x344.htm
I am assembling background for your information at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x342.htm
Yours
sincerely,
Ivor
Catt
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/x6kncool.htm
[6may00.
Over dinner tonight at Trinity College High Table and in the upper room sanctum
afterwards, Emeritus Master of Trinity Sir Andrew Huxley expressed interest to
Catt, on his left as the Port, Madeira and wine went round, in Catt's problems
with Pepper FRS of Trinity (whom he knew), McEwan and
Secker. He said he would go to Trinity library and read the book "The Catt
Anomaly". During conversation, I emphasised that Trinity could only
sustain further and further damage over the Catt Anomaly until something was
done. He recounted many instances of suppression in his own field, including
Mendel. I think he thought (as I do) that some of the suppressed advances
disappear for ever. Copy of this website item sent to
Sir Andrew Huxley via Trinity College. (Through this copy I would mention to
him that the book "The Catt Anomaly" is also on my website
www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/ ) - Ivor Catt, 6may00]
"Depending on who[m] you talk to in the
generally conservative semiconductor industry, Catt is either a crank or a visionary.
For 20 years, he has been refining the theoretical foundations for a revolution
in the semiconductor industry ...." - "On the importance of being
creative; Innovative thinkers should be allowed to come to the fore",
New Scientist, 12june86, p35;
".... Ivor Catt, an
innovative thinker whose own immense ability in electronics has all too often
been too far ahead of conventional ideas to be appreciated: significantly, Catt
is beginning to get some high-level backing from companies who see the possibility
of major breakthroughs from his work ('Wafers herald new era in computing',
New Scientist, 25 February 1989)." - New Scientist, 25nov89, p75. [In the end, the backing ran to £16 millions
of foreign and British Government money. The resulting product came to market
and was "best product of the year" for two US electronics journals -
ELECTRONIC DESIGN 26oct89 and another. See WSI on this
website.]
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Email to New Scientist.
To; Physical sciences news editor Victoria Jaggard
I am assembling a list, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x344.htm , of experts and journalists who comment or refuse to comment on my article at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf . It is quite fundamental.
Ivor Catt
01727 864257
From the past;
"Depending on who[m] you talk to in the generally conservative semiconductor industry, Catt is either a crank or a visionary. For 20 years, he has been refining the theoretical foundations for a revolution in the semiconductor industry ...." - "On the importance of being creative; Innovative thinkers should be allowed to come to the fore", New Scientist, 12june86, p35;
New Scientist; http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrns69mar.htm
".... Ivor Catt, an innovative thinker whose own immense ability in electronics has all too often been too far ahead of conventional ideas to be appreciated: significantly, Catt is beginning to get some high-level backing from companies who see the possibility of major breakthroughs from his work ('Wafers herald new era in computing', New Scientist, 25 February 1989)." - New Scientist, 25nov89, p75. [In the end, the backing ran to £16 millions of foreign and British Government money. The resulting product came to market and was "best product of the year" for two US electronics journals - ELECTRONIC DESIGN 26oct89 and another. See WSI on this website.]
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Dear Alison Wright, Editor, Nature Physics,
It has not been good in the past. See http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/64maychiao.htm
However, perhaps you will still read my key article http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf
Ivor
Catt
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@