Analysis of em.
|
|
Analysis of Electromagnetic Theory. Ivor Catt 21 June 2011. |
|
Electromagnetic Theory
developed from static fields and slowly changing fields. Hertz and Marconi
took us further, with electromagnetic fields in space. At the same time, Heaviside developed theory based on signals guided by
wires, but the glamorous wireless signalling captured the public to such an
extent that Heaviside was not mentioned in any text
book for more than 50 years. Wireless is a steady state
phenomenon where the medium is resonated, similar to the movement of a swing.
Heaviside’s Morse pulses in an undersea cable from
Newcastle to Denmark, and logic signals implying 1 or 0 in a digital
computer, are a totally different environment. Curiously, the Heaviside-Digital environment is more fundamental, involving
the transient, or shock. I came into digital
electronics near its beginning, in 1959. Not long after, the signal delay
across a computer became longer than the delay through a logic gate, and I
spent the next fifty years investigating its significance. It took me decades
to realise that what I was working with exposed fundamental problems for
classical electromagnetic theory. The first problem, first perceived in 1982,
is now called "The Catt Question" . We see that electric charge has
to travel at the speed of light, so gaining infinite mass. There was a
further delay of thirty years before the second flaw appeared in 2010, where
we see electric current travelling in both directions along a conductor - 1 , 2 . In the case of "The Catt
Question" , leading accredited experts contradicted each other and
made fools of themselves. Following this, their
bosses refused to investigate, as did the IEE . In
the case of 2010, or 1 ,
thirty relevant professors refused to comment. An even simpler, one page
exegesis of 2010, at present confidential, will be added to this analysis
presently. If, according to classical
theory, electricity has to gain infinite mass, and electric currents flow
past each other in a single conductor, this should cause us to scrutinise
electromagnetic theory and find out what has gone wrong. .
|
|
|
|
|