|
Three problems for classical
electrodynamics. However, we should perhaps precede them and discuss an
apparently reasonably innocent attempt to modify the orthodox dogma, which
is also ignored/suppressed. See http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x0358.htm
. This suggests that even relatively mild modifications to dogma are ignored/suppressed.
Self
Resonant Frequency.
In http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2603d.htm
we have a discussion of Wikipedia becoming an outpost of a censoring/suppression
Establishment. This is surely a minor modification to Received Theory of
Electromagnetism, but all the same it is suppressed. This warns us that the
suppression of major advances by Catt is not because they are major. Even
the assertion that a capacitor has no internal series inductance, and
therefore no self resonant frequency, is suppressed.
I have
also asked the Editor on the leading journal, Proc.IEEE, for advice on how
to get this information to members of the IEEE. He does not reply.
Ivor
Catt 16 March 2010
He agre
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Crosstalk (Noise) in Digital Systems
Pages
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , some of which is in two
of my books. The argument starts at page 30 of one book , and at page 4 of the other book
, continuing on page
55 . Here in
figure 9.2 we see “a very narrow pulse introduced at the front end of the
active line. If there were no parallel passive line nearby, this pulse
would travel down the active line (at the speed of light for the
dielectric) more or less unchanged,” in a TEM mode. “However, as the other
two traces show, the presence of the passive line caused the original
narrow pulse to break up into two similar pulses.”
|
