The following is from a medical forum. The writer prefers to stay
anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the
official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by
the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. I work in the healthcare field. Here's the problem, we are testing
people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There
are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable
agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus
cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and
reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments. This is why you're hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing
nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That's because most Coronavirus
strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel
Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a
very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues. The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory
isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and
particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the
cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral
isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or
Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically
takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral
sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known
viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very
tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute
contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially
gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole
genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you
ignore the other issues. The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell
analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of
the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of
virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these
kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense. And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load. If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It
therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s
the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness.
Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in
their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their
quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you
need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load
and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is
present in sufficient quantities to sicken you. If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be
identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads
to false diagnosis. And coronavirus are incredibly common. A
large percentage of the world human population will have covi
DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with
some other pathogen. Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally
false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus. They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high
percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial
pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi
even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply
because covis are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in
hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location
– say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral
sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is
suffering from a ‘new’ disease. Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high
proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and
use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course
produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more
‘cases’ and so on and so on. Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all
you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and
pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist. Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the
fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to
think critically. Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no
actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your
deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic. But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways. 1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are
imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the
quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. 2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible
and bully them into not talking about numbers. 3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with
pseudoscience. 4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely
have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’
with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound
deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have
the less deadly is your pathogen. Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely
manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks. They can not "confirm" something
for which there is no accurate test.
|
|||||||||||||
