http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/celia.pdf
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x41t.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x33w.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x94sorcerer.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/theend.htm
Matthew 13:4-9 New International Version (NIV)
4 As he was scattering the seed, some fell along the path, and the birds
came and ate it up. 5 Some fell on rocky
places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil
was shallow. 6 But when the sun came up, the plants
were scorched, and they withered because they had no root. 7 Other seed fell among
thorns, which grew up and choked the plants. 8 Still
other seed fell on good soil, where it produced a crop—a hundred, sixty or
thirty times what was sown. 9 Whoever has ears, let
them hear.”
The instrumentalists who
today control what was “science” have no roots – History of Science, Philosophy
of Science, Sociology of Science.
Digital electronics
(1965) was the sun. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm
. They kept in the shade as long as they could, which was more than half a
century.
The End of Science
The enemies of
science, MICE, are fourfold; mathematicians, instrumentalists, careerists,
EMC; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x19temc.pdf
"careerist"
maps onto academia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waEc4YbQQX0
plus qualified
"scientists". Thus, academia gives "qualifications" -
bits of paper - which those "qualified" use to get
jobs. which are gained by the parrots mastering old theory and,
parrot-like, returning the old information (which is what the lecturers, reappearing
as examiners, know) in exams. The exams classify the parrots for the right
jobs and status, in academia and elsewhere. Those qualified, with their
bits of paper, pay membership to institutions which publish “peer reviewed”,
that is “consensus” material, and protect the qualifications by blocking
scientific advances, only publishing decorations of old theory, consensus
theory.
Education in Latin,
the three R's, functioned reasonably in such a stable environment, where
information and skills did not change rapidly. The 1890s move of illiterate
farm workers from country to city factory massively increased the demand for
the (stable) three Rs. It was not appreciated that science could not be
articulated onto the educational system unless science was frozen.
The system would be
threatened by, (and would protect itself by fair means or foul against) rapid
changes in the information or skills. Initially resisting, academia stabilised
"scientific" knowledge on the 1905 ideas of Pop Scientist Einstein,
which became academic orthodoxy. The later Einstein 1970 was excluded as
"senile". http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/9101.htm "We all of us have
some idea of what the basic axioms in physics will turn out to be. The quantum
or particle will surely not be amongst them; the field, in Faraday's and
Maxwell's sense, could possibly be, but it is not certain." - Einstein in
"The Born-Einstain Letters" by Max
Born, pub. Macmillan 1971. p164. See "Nobel disease". https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nobel_disease ; http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrns86jun_0003.htm
The biggest shock
was the sudden appearance of high-speed digital electronics in 1960. During the
next half century, academia, already realising that change (and worst,
scientific revolution) threatened it, completely shut the door on such drastic
change - for example a signal from your computer telling your printer to print,
which is not a sine wave. The only permissible signal, in Wikipedia and
everywhere else, is the sine wave. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_line
In desperation, we
organised lucrative seminars, and published a book. None of this material is in
any university course today, nearly half a century later. http://www.ivorcatt.com/43.htm ; http://www.ivorcatt.org/digital-hardware-design.htm
The most
fundamental physics is electromagnetic theory, and the canon collapsed when the
signal changed from the sine wave to the step, or cattq http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2809.htm
Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by
instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of
not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of
misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of
thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.
- G. Orwell, 1984,
pub. Chancellor, 1984 edn., p225
It is not that when
presented with such a step, an academic blocks it, or
suppresses it. He does not even see it, or comprehend it. The
device used to blind him is called the Fourier Series. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series By the
time he is presented with cattq, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm
, he has undergone decades of brainwashing, called "education".
A heavy part of the brainwashing is that only sine waves exist in the physical
world. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91.htm "stated to me by
Professor Howie, then Head of the Cavendish, that "Physical reality is
composed of sine waves."" ; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm
A
Google search for "transmission line" + Fourier gives
500,000 hits. In every discussion of a transmission line, omega ω (= sine wave)
appears unannounced and without any justification. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm
A series of
accidents protected me from the full brainwashing, including the death of the
tutor in Cambridge who was supposed to tutor me in electricity. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2809.htm
On leaving college
and going to design one of the first digital computers, I asked my new boss
Charlie Portman what I should read. He replied; "Nothing. It's all
new." http://s3data.computerhistory.org/brochures/ferranti.sirius2.1961.102646235.pdf ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferranti_Sirius
My brainwashing was
imperfect, although I had the Cambridge bit of paper - a passport to any job.
Ivor Catt 7.10.2019 / 8.7.2020
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
|
06:26 (13 hours ago) |
|
||
|
||||
"What is needed
to save science is the total obliteration the academic social class." -SC
That's a great start.
1. Yes, we are still
awaiting a reply from Chris Palmer. He said he would get back to me several
months ago- April. 21, 2019.
2. John Dore has
failed to acknowledge that i=qc
is a mainstream equation. He has also failed to retract his assertion that it is
dimensionally incorrect.
3. Hawking is as fake
as the Hawking brand. The 'actual' Hawking died in the mid-1980's.
Non-speaking actors played the part ever since, until the fake death.
4. Steve, there is
plenty of hope. All of this pomp & fakery shall be burned to the ground in
the upcoming global wars which they have caused and prosecuted, Chris. Their
destruction of Science is merely one aspect of it, John. All of their accolades
and titles shall be mocked forevermore, Archie.
5.
Whomsoever subscribes to the 'mainstream' view, on anything whatsoever, is
a suspect. "They are judged accordingly."
6. For the larger
picture, The Pleistocene Murders is completed-
The Pleistocene Murders
Part 1, Introduction
Part 2, The Spring
of Life
Part 3, The Summer
of Life
Part 4, The Autumn
of Life
Part 5, The Winter
of Life
Part 6, The Carbon
Wars
Part 7, Judgment Day
There Will Be War,
Forrest
-----Original
Message-----
From: Ivor Catt
Sent: Oct 6, 2019 9:34 AM
To: Steve Crothers
Cc: John Raymond Dore , Forrest
Bishop , Alex Yakovlev , Archie Howie
Subject: Re: you or I?
(Hawking eqn.
faulty) " Now that they know about it
they have invoked the cone of silence." - S Crothers
I need your exegesis
on my website, or the www address where you do the analysis, that the eqn. on
Hawking's grave is faulty (specifically requested for his grave by Hawking).
Remember I first heard of "intrinsic" and "extrinsic" a month
ago, from you.
Bear in mind that
John jumped on Forrest when John thought the eqn. i=qc was
Forrest's. He backed off when it was pointed out to him that it was produced by
an Oxford lecturer who got prizes for being the bestest and mostest lecturer. Everyone and his brother will not
believe the eqn on Hawking's grave is
faulty, and will try to shoot you down, as you know well. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x2bg.pdf
By the way, Palmer
has failed to comment on cattq2 and cattq3. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x59q.htm
Ivor
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at
10:57, Steve Crothers <sjc7541@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ivor,
Ten years ago I had a
little hope. But now there is no hope. Science is a dead duck. Just look at the
embarrassment of Hawking's gravestone equation. Now that they know about it they have invoked the cone of silence. The same goes for
the non-existence of self resonant frequency
of a capacitor and that a capacitor is a transmission line. To protect their
careers and reputations the academics always ignore the truth and take measures
to suppress it, including fraud. What is needed to save science is the total
obliteration the academic social class.
Steve
|
|
Virus-free. www.avg.com |
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 7:42 PM Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
wrote:
Stephen,
I had no recollection of writing this remarkable
piece (91d below) 10 years ago. [ http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm ] When you said it to
me recently, I thought it was completely new; the idea that it is too late to
save science.
The enemies of science, I now realise, are
threefold; the triumverate -
mathematicians, careerists, instrumentalists. Together they control all the
commanding heights of "science".
Of course, you do not have to keep to the blocking
of "Theory C" (or actually D http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cbwash.htm ) . Come downmarket, and still important disclosures are
blocked. For instance; "A capacitor does not have a self-resonant
frequency". Even that is too threatening to the triumvirate. This
block means that a lot of unnecessary capacitors are added to all circuit
boards throughout the world, in order to save the canon.) http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2603.htm ; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1135992 .
Tony Davies http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/ieeetonycard.pdf and
I met his colleague in the IEE/IET HQ in London. Tony mentioned the idea that
"A capacitor does not have a self resonant frequency".
The colleague looked frightened, and ran away. I heard nothing more about it
from Tony, ex board of directors of the IEEE. Are all these guys running so
extremely scared? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x949.htm .
Is Tony concerned about https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1135992 ? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cktony.htm
Ivor
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm "The behaviour
of all our institutions when confronted by "The Catt Question"
delivers a bleak message for the future of science. Institutionalised failure
to deal with "The Catt Question" and other fundamental lacunae
threatens the survival of science." [e.g. the block on "A
capacitor does not have a self resonant frequency.]
|
11:17 (9 hours ago) |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Ivor,
Hawking's
nonsensical gravestone equation is exposed here:
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Hawking-Catt.html
The terms in
thermodynamics are 'intensive' and 'extensive', not 'intrinsic' and
'extrinsic'. The size of a sample has nothing to do with its temperature.
Divide a uniform sample in thermal equilibrium into two equal parts. The
temperature does not change, but the mass and the volume are halved - this is
an experimental fact beyond dispute. Temperature is intensive, volume and mass
are extensive. Now look at Hawking's gravestone equation. He has temperature
varying inversely with mass. He violates both the 0th and the 2nd laws of
thermodynamics, in which the intensive character of temperature is
embedded. Cambridge is a laughingstock, writ large in stone in
Westminster Abbey! Do you see any Cambridge dons admitting the invalidity of
Hawking's gravestone equation now that it has been so clearly revealed to
them and the world? Not a one. Cambridge is a fraud. And why did the Cambridge
dons not see Hawking's violation of thermodynamic? Because they are
incompetent. Here is another example of Cambridge dons' incompetence:
[1] Stephen
J. Crothers and Pierre-Marie Robitaille, Presentation at Ohio Meeting
2019 of the American Physical Society: Stellar Mass-Luminosity and its
Violation of Thermodynamics,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0eINoQdk0I&feature=share
[2] Stephen J. Crothers
and Pierre-Marie Robitaille,
Eddington’s
Mass-Luminosity Relationship: A Violation of the Laws of Thermodynamics, OSS19 Meeting of
The American Physical Society (F02.00005) March 30, 2019, http://vixra.org/pdf/1903.0563v1.pdf
[3] Crothers, S.J. and
Robitaille, P.-M., Eddington's mass-luminosity relation and the laws of
thermodynamics, Physics Essays, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2019,
Steve Crothers
|
|
Virus-free. www.avg.com |