Demystify and Destroy

In preparation. Ivor Catt 18.30 7.10.21

It gets ugly; Glitch http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/shilo41.htm

Dear Two,

http://async.org.uk/ay-festschrift/

As you know, I have had one hour on the telephone with you, and a two hours 40 minutes marathon, mostly on Zoom. I have also watched four hours of your video interviews. The conclusion was that you should do a series of interviews with me, an incomplete list of suggestions http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/shilo3.htm having been presented to you by me. You said you were happy for me to name names – DJHPP etc. You chose the first interview to be “The Glitch”. Bear in mind that I have only watched some five hours of your interviews, partly because I find them difficult to find.

I end up confused and mystified.

Today I suggest a resolution, which is buried in the title of your blog; “Demystifying Science.” You are both PhDs, but lost enthusiasm for that career route, to demystify mainstream science. However, your loss of enthusiasm may be incomplete. Perhaps only recently you came across Pierre-Marie Robitaille and his co-author Crothers, who is closely associated with me. I get the impression that Rob was on a suitably glittering career path, but then he changed direction and looked in wrong direction, finding a mess. What he found has been silenced, as is all the work of Crothers, today’s leading scientist.

You had set out on demystifying what must not be demystified, or it is destroyed.

I suggest the “Science” in your words “Demystifying Science” is “Modern Physics”, which is not science, but religion.

“Science” was still practised to some degree until the tipping point in 1965, when the anti-science consortium finally took control of all schools, universities, “scientific institutions” , text books, and private and public “research” funding; the biggest scam of all being CERN. I call them “MICE”, recently adding “Pop scientists” like Cox, Rees, Hawking, Al-Khalili.

The present Covid fiasco makes the situation even more clear. Before Covid, my default position was that an “expert” knew a great deal about his own speciality and had some knowledge of associated subjects. However, with Covid, I watch fifteen minutes of Youtube with one “expert” followed by fifteen minutes with an “expert” in an allied subject – for instance virology and immunology – and am shocked to find that in fifteen minutes twice I know more about the other speciality than they do. For instance, two days ago, sitting on a bench by the Roman wall in Verulamium where I live, where I met a supercharged relevant professor, and I found, when he mentioned PCR, that he had never heard of Nobellist Kary Mullis.

The DHJPP I have chosen to represent “Modern Physics” include a half Nobel prize winner and the ex-head of the https://www.phy.cam.ac.uk/ Cavendish.

I was wrong to downgrade then as they wrote more and more silly stuff to me. I should have started them at zero and been pleased when they showed signs of technical competence in their writings. In particular, I assumed, and they think, that they have some degree of competence in the core scientific subject, electromagnetic theory, on which I think all hangs. They think all other specialities are stuck in the text books, and their isolated brilliance was to advance their speciality a little beyond.

On Youtube you can see an agitated Nobel Prize Winner say to schoolmaster Unziger; “When it gets into the text books, it stays there”, meaning Nobel prizes are for those who innovate in ways which do not threaten what came before them, which is in the text books. That is, the prizes are for those who decorate the canon. Everyone else is silenced.

I have had personal contact with about ten leading silenced scientists.

Duesberg, Arp, Moran, Hillman, Essen, Theocharis, Dingle, Crothers, Catt, Rasnick, Boehmer-Christianson, Josephson. A possible explanation is here; http://www.ivorcatt.uk/Y65BRILL.htm

They have found fatal flaws in the ruling theory in their speciality, often at a core level. Caroline says for a man to progress in “science” today, he has to be dishonest, able to overlook the fatal flaws so that his career may advance. The deceased Caroline and Hillman would say one has to be dishonest or stupid, or both.

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/caroline.htm .

Research needs to go into why and how Howie, Pepper, Palmer and Josephson (of DHJPP) manage to not understand the very simple, clear cattq http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . These contemporary “Scientists” have probably never heard of Kuhn, and certainly not of Polanyi, and do not know that scientific advance destroys careers and reputations. They do not know that a true scientist has to be grounded in familiarity with Philosophy of Science, History of Science, Sociology of Science. He has to appreciate that “Science is the search for Truth” – five million Google search results – or else say that it is not. DHJPP will not say that it is not. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cktony.htm . What happened to the professors when Lavoisier got rid of phlogiston? Did they get him beheaded for this, not because he was a hated tax gatherer? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.pdf

Fifty years ago, Dawe of Oxford pointed out for me a fatal flaw in classical electromagnetism, not noticing it himself. After a decade or two, two “Science” high priests were forced to comment. They contradicted each other as to what classical electromagnetism was. I called this “The Catt Anomaly”; the anomaly that there was not a single classical electromagnetism, but two contradictory versions, the “Westerner” and the “Southerner”. All of this was silenced for some further decades, until three “publish or perish” Italian professors side-stepped peer review and published the silenced contradiction, misrepresenting cattq and pretending that it was not a contradiction between “Science” high priests. They said cattq was saying that there was something wrong with classical electromagnetism, which cattq did not. They also said Catt did not understand the subject, and they went incommunicado thereafter. To clarify the matter, Catt renamed “The Catt Anomaly” as “The Catt Question”. Come forward a further half a decade, and Michael Shilo thought cattq required an answer, and gave one, not realising that there were already two answers, and he merely increased this to three.

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x162.pdf Today’s “Science” is a club, not of search-after-truth scientists, but careerists who can be classified as MICE and “Pop Scientists”. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/sumption.htm

MICE is Mathematicians http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x31n.pdf , Instrumentalists http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x231.pdf , Careerists, EMC http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x19temc.pdf

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8ahcharlton.html

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22peer+review+cartel%22&t=hx&va=g&ia=web

Bruce Charlton's Notions: Churches have neglected that ...

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2020/01/churches-have-neglected-that-dishonesty.html

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com › 2020 › 01 › churches-have-neglected-that-dishonesty.html “!In effect, truth has been replaced by status; as happened in science where a peer review cartel nowadays (and for several decades) controls appointments, promotions, publications, funding and prizes - hence the consensus of science-managers defines what counts as 'truth'. Yet there is near zero awareness of this fact. Consequently, evil is pursued under cover of lies, with impunity. All this ... “