The
Penumbra
penumbra
|
11:25 (30
minutes ago) |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Tony,
I shall put this
email at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/penumbra.htm
I now think your
role is central to the whole history of science as it develops. Your
experiments W1 thru W4, with their heretical results, which destroy classical
electromagnetism, are well described in http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm . W1 is now
in the Royal Society journal. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm
What destroyed
science was not the egoistical chancers like Pepper and Rees.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0l1diFGxIg . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2urJ4agYGw . Such self-centred people were bound
to appear within "science", as they will appear in any other
institution, or profession.
The research needed
is into the penumbra, or fellow-travellers, who give them cover. A
fellow-traveller is too frightened to say that someone like Pepper,
"Knighted for services to Physics", recipient of the Faraday Medal,
has written rubbish about cattq. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . He is also too frightened to
say Pepper has not written rubbish.
He is too frightened to say he doesn't know whether Pepper's is rubbish. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2812.htm . We all
(have to?) posture as more knowledgeable and competent than we truly are.
This is only one of
many, many situations where a fellow-traveller is exposed. I have forced enough
fellow-travellers to break the code of omerta of the academic mafia, to show
that they are members of the penumbra shielding chancers like Pepper and
Spargo.
The Duck
Test https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test can be used
to determine whether an individual is a chancer, or part of the penumbra, or a
scientist (devoted to the search for truth).
At any time, any
member of the penumbra is welcome to break rank, and make even a minimal
contribution to my analysis - for instance by saying (or preferably showing
that) my analysis is false, or not false, or he doesn't know - and all will be
forgiven. Or by commenting on your experiments.
You, Tony, can be
extremely proud of your contribution to science. I hope you will write down at
length details of your extraordinary career, beginning with your birth, saying
which part of your anecdote is public, and which part(s) confidential to me
alone. Your case is quite extraordinary, as recounted by you to me on Skype
from Australia, 12,000 miles away, when we have not met for fifty years.
"You couldn't make it up".
I was 12,000 miles
away from your historic experiments. They never had to be done, because the
logic within classical electromagnetism takes us into the internal
contradictions within classical electromagnetism which they expose, or
illustrate. Palmer, Spargo and Dore said they would repeat your experiments,
but they wisely did not repeat experiments the results of which refute
classical electromagnetism. Your experiments will probably never be repeated,
since they undermine the canon. Totally unfunded,
with W1 now in the Royal Society journal, why should you carry out your further
experiments, W5, W6, since the results would not be publishable? This, even
though one of them might well solve the key (battery) problem for the currently
very fashionable electric car? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/585.htm . No fellow-traveller dare even enquire
about W5 and W6. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.pdf
Ivor Catt 22.8.2021
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/exh.htm