Fwd: maths and physics - The Dangers of Over Confidence

Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>	18 Jan 2020, 10:36
to me

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 15:22
Subject: Re: maths and physics - The Dangers of Over Confidence
To: Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>, HARRY RICKER <kc3mx@yahoo.com>
Cc: Alex Yakovlev <alex.yakovlev@newcastle.ac.uk>, Anthony Davies <tonydavies@ieee.org>, John Raymond Dore <johnrdore@gmail.com>, Christopher Spargo <christopher.spargo@gmail.com>, Steve Crothers <sjc7541@gmail.com>

Harry,

I thought this may be a good paper to read.

Regards,

Malcolm

---

From: HARRY RICKER <kc3mx@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 9:23 AM
To: Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Yakovlev <alex.yakovlev@newcastle.ac.uk>; Anthony Davies <tonydavies@ieee.org>; John Raymond Dore <johnrdore@gmail.com>; Christopher Spargo <christopher.spargo@gmail.com>; Steve Crothers <sjc7541@gmail.com>; Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: maths and physics

Ivor,

The parrots are everywhere. They write the newspapers, they run Hollywood, they occupy management positions in corporations, they control the news networks, they are in the bureaucracy of government, they run for office and become our government. They talk nonsense all the time on TV and radio, and don't have a clue what damage they are causing and most disturbing and serious, they don't care what damage they cause. They leave a path of destruction in their wake, and say someone else is responsible for the pain and suffering they have produced due to ignorance and lust for power and greed. 

Harry 

On Friday, January 17, 2020, 09:11:50 AM EST, Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com> wrote:

I re-devloped the idea of the parrot recently. The best trained parrot gets the top marks, and rises to the top of the Cavendish. I only recently realised that during his 10 or 20 years of "education" (brainwashing) he is not only taught how to parrot the ruling canon; he is also taught to not understand something outside the canon, however obvious to someone who has 

not been brainwashed (educated)

Ivor 

There once was an old man of Esser
Whose knowledge grew lesser and lesser.
It at last grew so small
He knew nothing at all
And now he's a college professor. Noam Esser

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 13:01, HARRY RICKER <kc3mx@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ivor,

You may not appreciate this, but I can understand your frustration with the mainstream establishment. It is obvious to almost everybody, but them, that Einstein's theory of special relativity is an absurdity. The follow on general relativity is obviously ridiculous, since it is based upon a mathematically absurd theory, that is easily shown to be mathematically wrong. But they continue to teach this nonsense and proclaim it as scientifically true, when it is obvious to anyone, with only a rudimentary understanding, that is is completely wrong and false. 

So bottom line is how can these pretentious science experts be believed, when they promote mathematical nonsense and worse, as being scientifically proven to be true? Based on experimental facts that are fudged and  mathematics that is so obviously incorrect! It boggles the mind to see that sort of thing existing today, when it is clearly and obviously incorrect. Everybody sees that, but they do not. Why are they so ignorant of the truth?

Harry

On Friday, January 17, 2020, 06:46:24 AM EST, Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com> wrote:

I just phoned Stephen Crothers in Tasmania, and find he fully agrees with what I said. He also said Tony and John would not reply. He was also comfortable with my thinking it out and immediately sending it off, saying that I had been studying the problem for decades.

The anti-science careerists don't know they are anxious to block scientific advance.

Since the few surving scioentists refuse to cooperate with each other to save science, the careerists will probably keep control, strangling science, for a couple of decades more, when I will be over 100.

Ivor

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 11:16, Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com> wrote:

Alex,

My ideas continue to evolve.

I should be spending time on something else, so this is quick.

Newton wrote his laws in Latin. There was no mathematics.

Faraday made discoveries in physics. Maxwell dumped some maths on Faraday.

The maths which today purports to be electromagnetic theory contains such symbols as E, electric field. By definition, this excludes the possibility that E does not exist, only ExH

The maths is a straightjacket, preventing scientific advance.

The true role of maths is as a shorthand to briefly (attempt to) describe the ruling canon for electromagnetic theory. It has nothing to do with scientific advance.

What we will find is that Tony Davies, ex board of directors of the IEEE, will give no help if I try to publish this kind of important realisation in the IEEE. He will even not say he is unable to help. He will think this sort of discussion is unimportant. So will John Dore FIEE.

This is the kind of scientific experiment which will demonstrate that the whole of science is under the control of anti-science careerists.

Should a scientist be allowed to use the Scientific Method to research the Scientific Reception System? John Dore and Tony (and Spargo) will not reply.

Ivor

One attachment • Scanned by Gmail