Parrot8

 

Christopher <christopher.spargo@gmail.com>

20 Nov 2018, 23:53

Description: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif

Description: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif

to me, Alex, John

Description: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif

Define 'parrot'

 

On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, 09:03 Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com wrote:


Like Wakefield, Cooley is not a well trained parrot. They left academia at the age of 16 or so. They will not know how to limit what they know to what they were taught and to return it to the examiners (= teachers) in "examinations", receiving certificates in conformity. Spargo (and my mother) did well, receiving first class degrees and more. (All this resentful stuff from me is because I got a 2.2)

When he stayed in my house 10 years ago for ten days, Cooley did not tell me he was without qualifications (i.e. not a parrot). (I should have detected it.)

Spargo (another first class parrot) is desperate to find out whether the Wakefield results are parrot talk - knowable for a parrot.

Professor Tony Davies writes a lot to me about how to train parrots, himself a parrot. He has nothing to say about cattq, saying he lacks the experimental equipment to address it. It's an interesting idea, to need experimental equipment in order to think about a Question like cattq - "The Catt Question".

Forrest Bishop fell off the parrot training one year into his degree, so he got a lot more brainwashing than C and F. This was too late for the Thought Police (academia), and he broke away, developing new thoughts. (Unfortunately he spent a month of training by Catt, and now talks the Catt-parrot talk. You can find it all over the www.)

It's all in Orwell and Huxley. Huxley's Nobel prizewinner "?grandson?" Huxley became a parrot (Nobel is the top parroting prize), and wrote conformist drivel to me about cattq. It's on my website. It's extremely difficult for a parrot to deal with cattq. Nobel Josephson has written a lot of drivel about cattq, and says Pepper has changed his mind about cattq. (Trinity again! One of his emails says; "Beware the Catt!")   http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.htm

I've only just realised that Pepper worked for Huxley. They both sent drivel to me about cattq! So Huxley steered clear of his ?grandfather's? ideas, an was rewarded with Nobel, and even more, Master of Trinity, my college. Trinity men know how to do the parrot, and used to have more nobel prizes than France.

Yakovlev came from the ultimate Brave New World (Orwell says his book is about the USSR), and his behaviour in our kind of totalitarian system is well worth watching. He tells me he is not a politician. Watching him we can learn a lot. He has survived both systems, although he's too clever by half.

Ivor

Malcolm was right to tell Alex and Spargo to limit their visit to me to two days. I find my meetings with Malcolm very exhausting, because our discussion goes outside the box.

Maybe if we took a day off talking, we could last five days.

I need to take a rest. 

Ivor

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Cooley, Ernest <ecooley@xos.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:55 AM
Subject: Further demonstrations with the 100 foot coax were done in 2016
To: Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
Cc: Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com>

 

In 2016 I bought some mercury wetted relays to do capacitor discharge into resistors but the relays were defective.

They only worked by tilting but still sufficed as non-bouncing switches.

I used these to do a demonstration at a small education conference in Massachusetts.

 

From: Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 6:01 PM
To: Cooley, Ernest <ecooley@xos.com>
Cc: Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Capacitor charging in steps (2015)

 

Come on!

You can do the new stuff!

I must admit there is a niche for you to tell schoolteachers they can do it.

The Italians rubbished me in the journal "Physics Education". I could give you the details, and you could write a short article and offer it to the editor who edited an article rubbishing me. He would not remember the trouble he had over me, I got the president of his InstPhys to overrule him, but I lacked the time to continue.

If you are interested in doing this, ask me for more details.

The three rogue Florence professors published in his journal damaging to Catt.

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5as2.pdf 

Ivor 

 

My co-author Malcolm Davidson is now in the Boston area, NE US.

He is doing things in schools 

 

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:32 PM Cooley, Ernest <ecooley@xos.com> wrote:

 

With 100 feet of RG8 the steps are also visible on an old cheap low bandwidth analog scope.

 

Capacitor:

100 feet of RG8 50 ohm coax (Belden 8214)

~2600pF calculated capacitance

2682pF measured capacitance

 

Test Equipment:

Simpson 420 Function Generator

~100KHz square wave via 600 ohm output

 

Tektronix TDS 2024B

Channel 1 (yellow) connected to signal generator output

Channel 2 (blue) connected to far end of RG8 coax