http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/ieee1.htm
Animation
of “The Catt Question”.
Westerner answer . Southerner answer .
Hyperlinks
for my comments on the article "Catt's
Anomaly" by Massimiliano Pieraccini
and Stefano Selleri, IEEE Antennas and Propagation
Magazine, Vol. 54, No. 6, December 2012, pp 240 – 241.
Extracts
from
their article "Catt's
Anomaly"
amateurs
and bizarre men away from academia, ....
Ivor
Catt is probably one of these [2], an engineer and amateur scientist
Sir Michael Pepper (born August 10, 1942), a
renowned physicist ....
Besides some wrong explanations [e.g. by Pepper]
incompatible with Gauss’ Law, most of the answers agreed in considering the
problem not to be an anomaly at all.
Catt tried to
develop his own theory .... http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x0305.htm
Giuseppe Pelosi A “Full Professor
of the Electromagnetic Field”, he refuses to give his opinion as to whether
“The Catt Question” points to 1; a fatal flaw in classical theory, 2; no fatal
flaw, or 3; he is unsure.
“Catt had published
extensively in IEEE journals up to 1967.”
"Crosstalk (Noise) in digital
systems." 20pp
"The
Glitch" . Professor
Kinniment “They did not believe a problem existed, and if it did, they didn’t want
to know. Nevertheless, he [Catt] wrote a short note about it and got it published
in an IEEE journal in 1966. The note is written rather obscurely, and has
errors in it, but the drift is clear, there’s a problem.”
“Chaney and Littlefield had had considerable
difficulty persuading the [peer] reviewers to accept their paper, referees
would say things like “if this was a problem, I would have heard about it. I haven’t so I don’t think it exists”.”
"Computer Worship" “For a bibliography on the glitch, see T.J. Chaney and C.E. Molnar, “Anomalous Behaviour of Synchronizer and Arbiter Circuits”, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, April 1973. The subject still has not risen above the correspondence columns in that august journal. [7 years after my IEEE paper.]
"Wireless
World" ; "Death of
Electric Current"
Second article by the authors in "Physics Education" .
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/9100.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x0742.pdf
http://www.iiis.org/acceptance-policy.asp
Campanario (1995) affirms that eight authors won
the Nobel Prize after
their prize winning ideas were initially rejected by reviewers and editors.
No
mention of paradigm change in the lengthy article
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Harry Ricker
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/11/21/catt-question-letter/
Stephen Crothers
http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2016/PP-44-13.PDF