|
sjcrothers@plasmaresources.com
|
|
16 Mar 2020,
15:07
|
|
|
to tonydavies, Alex, me, Malcolm, Dave, John, Brian
|
|
Dear Mr. Davies,
You withheld unnecessarily the identity of the professor you quoted.
Please give us his name and affiliation. All you have done
is tell
those on this circulation what they already know. Moreover, your
message ridicules scientists and kindergarten children in favour of
the thoughtless retired engineers and professors of anything
electrical. If your missive was sincere it would not have been sent to
this circulation alone, but also to the Board of Directors of the IEEE
and the IEE and all their editors, and the officials at the Royal
Society and Trinity College Cambridge and the editors of their
publications on physics and engineering, and the editor, Mr. Mike
Lockwood, of the Transactions of the Royal Society which published the
article on the Wakefield experiments by Mr. Yakovlev. You have
actually made it quite clear that you have no intention to assist
Mr.
Catt publish fifty words in an IEEE journal, despite your current
membership and past official capacities in the IEEE, let alone tell
Mr. Catt if you will or will not assist him to publish the said fifty
words. You have also remained eerily silent on the issue of the
invalid equation for temperature (of a black hole) chiselled into the
tombstone of Mr. Hawking, being a violation of the laws of
thermodynamics. It is of course another major embarrassment for
astronomers and cosmologists and Trinity dons in particular. Is it
better to hide this truth as well from university students, school
children, and the public at large, to protect the careers and
reputations of the ignoramuses responsible?
Hawking's Gravestone and Mr. Catt,
www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Hawking-Catt.html
Yours faithfully,
Steve Crothers
________________________________
Quoting tonydavies@ieee.org:
> Ivor,
> Nothing connected with the Heaviside Prize, but you might
be
> interested in the following:
> I was at a lecture at Imperial College last week by a retired
> professor who started out in Electrical Engineering (as it used to
> be).
> He said the following:
> An "eminent" person is someone who is able to stop all
progress in
> the field in which he is an expert.
> A "very eminent person" is someone who can not only stop
progress in
> the field in which he is an expert but can also stop progress in
> some other fields about which he may know nothing.
> If you wish to make a reasonably prediction of what may happen
> (technology related) in the future, do not ask an 'expert' -
better
> to ask a young child and you will probably get a more
accurate
> prediction of what really happens. There are many well known
> examples of this - such as the head of IBM saying that Britain, as
> an advanced country, might eventually need as many as five digital
> computers, and before that, the "inventor" of the telephone
having
> claimed that in future, every city in the USA will want one, the
> answer from some important person in England (whose name I forget)
> said that here we have no need of the telephone because we have a
> sufficient supply of messenger boys for our needs.
> I hesitate to take this reasoning on to the apparent conclusion
that
> problems of charging capacitors and of electromagnetic theory
should
> be solved by asking children in kindergarten schools to provide
the
> answers, and that retired engineers and professors have nothing
> useful to say on the subject.
> Rgds
> Tony Davies2020 March 16th.Prof Anthony C DaviesEmeritus
Professor,
> King's College LondonIEEE R8 History
Activities coordinationIEEE
> Industry Applications Society Distinguished Lecturer 2017-2018
> e-mail: tonydavies@ieee.org web: www.tonydavies.org.uk
>
>
> On Saturday, 14 March 2020, 22:07:47 GMT, Ivor
Catt
> <ivorcatt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Malcolm,It's not clear to me whether
"The Heaviside Prize" is
> public
> information now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr9-Nu5HvWM&feature=youtu.be
> On another matter, I
> find http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html was
upgraded this
> year, and is excellent. I wonder whether it is now impossible
for
> Tong to remain silent. I suppose he still
> can. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm .
It will probably take
> even more to get some useful words or action from Tony, Oppo,
Pepper
> and the rest of the mafia. However, we may be getting close
to
> breaking through the blocking of scientific
> advance. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cbwash.htm . I
feel that the
> position of those paid to advance science who take every
opportunity
> to block scientific advance is surely untenable in the long term.
> It's dreadful to think what history will say of them.Crothers says
> science is dead and cannot be retrieved, but I am not
convinced. The
> juxtaposition of http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm
> http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.pdf
> http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Hawking-Catt.html
> and http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html
is extraordinary, and
> might encourage one of our lily-livered jornalists to
take the
> plunge, and publish on the scandal. Then the avalanche would come.
> All the rest of the sheep would promptly change direction.
> Ivor
>
> | | Virus-free. www.avast.com
|
>
>
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 17:40, Alex Yakovlev
> <Alex.Yakovlev@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Great. I’ve just twitted
> it:https://mobile.twitter.com/alexyakovlevncl/status/1238880323057987589Let’s
> see!Alex
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Mar 2020, at 17:01, Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
> for your perusal!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr9-Nu5HvWM&feature=youtu.be
>
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
|
|
Libuse Mikova, Bcc: Monika
Vandory, Ben Jones
|
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <sjcrothers@plasmaresources.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 15:07
Subject: Re: The Heaviside Prize?
To: <tonydavies@ieee.org>
Cc: Alex Yakovlev <alex.yakovlev@newcastle.ac.uk>,
Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@gmail.com>, Malcolm
Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com>, Dave
Walton <dswalton@plus44.net>, John Raymond
Dore <johnrdore@gmail.com>, Brian
Josephson <bdj10@cam.ac.uk>
Dear Mr. Davies,
You withheld unnecessarily the identity of the professor you
quoted.
Please give us his name and affiliation. All you have done is tell
those on this circulation what they already know. Moreover,
your
message ridicules scientists and kindergarten children in favour
of
the thoughtless retired engineers and professors of
anything
electrical. If your missive was sincere it would not have been sent
to
this circulation alone, but also to the Board of Directors of the
IEEE
and the IEE and all their editors, and the officials at the
Royal
Society and Trinity College Cambridge and the editors of
their
publications on physics and engineering, and the editor, Mr.
Mike
Lockwood, of the Transactions of the Royal Society which published
the
article on the Wakefield experiments by Mr. Yakovlev. You
have
actually made it quite clear that you have no intention to assist
Mr.
Catt publish fifty words in an IEEE journal, despite your
current
membership and past official capacities in the IEEE, let alone
tell
Mr. Catt if you will or will not assist him to publish the said
fifty
words. You have also remained eerily silent on the issue of
the
invalid equation for temperature (of a black hole) chiselled into
the
tombstone of Mr. Hawking, being a violation of the laws of
thermodynamics. It is of course another major embarrassment
for
astronomers and cosmologists and Trinity dons in particular. Is
it
better to hide this truth as well from university students,
school
children, and the public at large, to protect the careers
and
reputations of the ignoramuses responsible?
Hawking's Gravestone and Mr. Catt,
www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Hawking-Catt.html
Yours faithfully,
Steve Crothers
________________________________
Quoting tonydavies@ieee.org:
> Ivor,
> Nothing connected with the Heaviside Prize, but you might
be
> interested in the following:
> I was at a lecture at Imperial College last week by a
retired
> professor who started out in Electrical Engineering (as it used
to
> be).
> He said the following:
> An "eminent" person is someone who is able to stop all
progress in
> the field in which he is an expert.
> A "very eminent person" is someone who can not only stop
progress in
> the field in which he is an expert but can also stop progress
in
> some other fields about which he may know nothing.
> If you wish to make a reasonably prediction of what may
happen
> (technology related) in the future, do not ask an 'expert' -
better
> to ask a young child and you will probably get a more
accurate
> prediction of what really happens. There are many well known
> examples of this - such as the head of IBM saying that Britain,
as
> an advanced country, might eventually need as many as five
digital
> computers, and before that, the "inventor" of the
telephone having
> claimed that in future, every city in the USA will want one,
the
> answer from some important person in England (whose name I
forget)
> said that here we have no need of the telephone because we have
a
> sufficient supply of messenger boys for our needs.
> I hesitate to take this reasoning on to the apparent conclusion
that
> problems of charging capacitors and of electromagnetic theory
should
> be solved by asking children in kindergarten schools to provide
the
> answers, and that retired engineers and professors have
nothing
> useful to say on the subject.
> Rgds
> Tony Davies2020 March 16th.Prof Anthony C DaviesEmeritus
Professor,
> King's College LondonIEEE R8 History
Activities coordinationIEEE
> Industry Applications Society Distinguished Lecturer 2017-2018
> e-mail: tonydavies@ieee.org web: www.tonydavies.org.uk
>
>
> On Saturday, 14 March 2020, 22:07:47 GMT, Ivor
Catt
> <ivorcatt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Malcolm,It's not clear to me
whether "The Heaviside Prize" is
> public
> information now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr9-Nu5HvWM&feature=youtu.be
> On another matter, I
> find http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html was
upgraded this
> year, and is excellent. I wonder whether it is now impossible
for
> Tong to remain silent. I suppose he still
> can. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm .
It will probably take
> even more to get some useful words or action from Tony, Oppo,
Pepper
> and the rest of the mafia. However, we may be getting close
to
> breaking through the blocking of scientific
> advance. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cbwash.htm . I
feel that the
> position of those paid to advance science who take every
opportunity
> to block scientific advance is surely untenable in the long
term.
> It's dreadful to think what history will say of them.Crothers
says
> science is dead and cannot be retrieved, but I am not
convinced. The
> juxtaposition of http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm
> http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.pdf
> http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Hawking-Catt.html
> and http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html
is extraordinary, and
> might encourage one of our lily-livered jornalists to
take the
> plunge, and publish on the scandal. Then the avalanche would
come.
> All the rest of the sheep would promptly change direction.
> Ivor
>
> | | Virus-free. www.avast.com
|
>
>
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 at 17:40, Alex Yakovlev
> <Alex.Yakovlev@newcastle.ac.uk>
wrote:
>
> Great. I’ve just twitted
> it:https://mobile.twitter.com/alexyakovlevncl/status/1238880323057987589Let’s
> see!Alex
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Mar 2020, at 17:01, Malcolm Davidson <malcolmd3111@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dear All,
> for your perusal!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mr9-Nu5HvWM&feature=youtu.be
>
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
|
|
Sans Serif
|
|
|
|