Fwd: Corona
Guesstimating, USA
|
20:44 (2
minutes ago) |
|
||
|
||||
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Steve Crothers <sjc7541@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 12:29
Subject: Fwd: Corona Guesstimating, USA
To:
Dear All,
Here Dr. Annie Bubacek.,
in the USA, reveals how the authorities are fudging numbers for an outcome they
want on Covid-19.
Something that Dr. Bubacek
does not mention is that the test used to diagnose a patient with Covid-19 is a
not specific to Covid -19 at all. It is a relatively
simple test that reports the presence of genetic material from a corona virus.
There are very many different strains of corona virus. If such a test reports
presence of corona virus is it used by the authorities to claim a Covid-19
case. This is patently false. The test used cannot tell which corona virus
strain is represented by the genetic material present. Furthermore, the test
used to diagnose Covid-19 is far from perfect - false positives and false
negatives can and do occur. The authorities are routinely multiple-testing
people who test negative until they get a positive and then pronounce a Covid-19
case, again despite the scientific fact that the test used cannot tell any
corona virus strain from another corona virus strain. Testing until a
desired outcome occurs is fraudulent. Say a person has two tests, both
negative. A third test is ordered and returns a positive, again not specific
for Covid-19 because it cannot do that. This final test is used by authorities
to report a Covid-19 case. In other words, 1/3 of the tests is used to claim a
Covid-19 case. Scientific method demands that the 2/3 of the tests in this
example is the right one; negative. If a positive is obtained on the 1st test
the authorities claim a Covid-19 case again, without further testing, despite
the test being unable to delineate between any strain of corona virus. To test specifically
for Covid-19 requires a much more expensive and elaborate laboratory test. The
authorities are not undertaking such a test on any alleged Covid-19 case.
Percentage death rate is very simply calculated:
% death = (number of deaths from the infectious disease)/(number of people infected by the microbe causing the
disease) x 100%
The means used by the authorities is organised to maximise the numerator
(deaths from the disease) and to minimise the denominator (number of infected
people). This makes the death rate much higher than reality. It is a scientific
fact that the authorities have no idea whatsoever as to the number that must go
into the denominator, and they are not doing anything to try to find out; and
the number that they put into the numerator is very much amplified by the
method I described above with their non-specific tests. Finally, people who
have contracted Covid-19 and recovered, without any test or medical assistance,
must be counted in the denominator. The test described above cannot in any case
determine if such a person had Covid-19 because such a person must be tested
for antibodies specific to Covid-19; a completely different kind of test. No
such tests are being carried out randomly on the population by any
authorities.
Thus, the numbers reported by the authorities with the aid of the media,
have no scientific validity. But they do drive mass-hysteria; the desired
outcome of the authorities, in order to introduce means to deprive citizens of
their civil liberties and their money (e.g. superannuation losses across the
board).
Steve
|
Virus-free. www.avast.com |
Attachments area
Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek
discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being manipulated