"The truth that there are no
truths."
I established the following from
John Dore today. The statement has been slightly modified.
"Should we knowingly lie to students in order to help an
electrician to wire up a house?" The answer from John Dore FIET on 18.10.2020
is; "No." “Ivor
You should not promulate falsehoods as a matter of principle.”
I need the answer to the question
from Nobellist Brian Josephson; ex head of the
Cavendish Archie Howie; Ex Board of Directors of the IEEE Tony Davies.
The future of science is at
stake. Alternatively, the three may say the future of science is not at stake.
If they are scientists, they have
to comment. Or they may say a "senior scientist" is not obliged to
comment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archibald_Howie
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/ieeetonycard.pdf
Josephson sent me more than
100 emails.
Howie sent me 30 emails of length
30 lines. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/howieland.htm In
1983 he wrote 2 pages on Cattq.
Tony Davies sent me 20,000 words
in emails.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
16.10.2020
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/ahowie.pdf
|
Fri, 16 Oct, 20:45 (4 days ago) |
|
||
|
||||
Howie was head
of the Cavendish Laboratory from 1989 to 1997. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_Laboratory
In 1983 he wrote to
me 2pp about cattq http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm , mentioning the eggs
to Oxford. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x64t2.htm He is a
westerner. (He sends ten times as many eggs too slowly.)
I tried again 10
years later. In 1993 Pepper wrote to me. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2812.htm taking the
southerner position. You see that he dismissed the (Howie) westerner position
over cattq. Pepper worked for Howie in the
Cavendish. Sir Michael Pepper was later "knighted for services to
physics". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0l1diFGxIg
For the next 30
years they refused to discuss their contradictory positions.
I shall further
elaborate their truly scandalous behaviour, blocking scientific
advance for nearly half a century.
Ivor Catt
The key issue
is not whether, when we come to cattq, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm ,
Howie’s westerner or Pepper’s southerner answer is correct. Further, the key
issue is not their technical competence. Much more
important, their moral competence is the issue. It is necessary for someone in
their position to either state that cattq is
unimportant, or else they have to do something about their disagreement. If
they fail to do anything, it will mean not only that they are not scientists,
but also they are totally immoral and destructive.
Leaving such a matter unresolved for further time will be extremely destructive.
Ivor Catt 20.10.2020